Talk:Secure Sockets Layer

From Citizendium
Jump to navigation Jump to search
This article is developing and not approved.
Main Article
Definition [?]
Related Articles  [?]
Bibliography  [?]
External Links  [?]
Citable Version  [?]
To learn how to update the categories for this article, see here. To update categories, edit the metadata template.
 Definition Please add a brief definition or description.
Checklist and Archives
 Workgroup category Computers [Categories OK]
 Subgroup category:  Security
 Talk Archive none  English language variant American English
To do.

Metadata here


What is the right way to set up naming for this group of articles? My guess is one article, Transport Layer Security (the protocol's current name) with TLS, Secure Sockets Layer and SSL all redirecting to it. But there are questions. Should this one remain as a separate article? Should the titles use lowercase? Where does https fit in? Sandy Harris 04:34, 28 November 2008 (UTC)

I've never like the TLS term, since it tends to coerce OSI terminology into the IPS. Is end-to-end security any better, and would it pick up https? Of course, nothing is clean when one gets into security proxies...Howard C. Berkowitz 21:22, 28 November 2008 (UTC)
I heartily agree about TLS, but I suppose some might say using "sockets" in the name imposes Berkeley Unix terminology on systems where it does not belong. My first choice would be Secure HTTP; it seems to me that's the point of the protocols and we generally don't use abbreviations like "https". However, that is a bit artificial, so I'm not certain what's best. Sandy Harris 05:24, 2 March 2010 (UTC)