User talk:Robert Tito/Archive 1

From Citizendium
Jump to navigation Jump to search

computer articles

"Hi David, Is your list in computers going to be extensive or an example of what is and what is needed? It might be easier to start from the Computers page and scrolling down and copying in present and lacking articles. That way we are not creating a clutter os loose threads without coherence. Let me hear your thoughts on it please. Robert Tito | Talk 22:07, 21 February 2007 (CST)"

Actually, I was just trying to make sure the article I created was not an isolated orphan. I'll link to it from the "See also" section in Computers. --David Marcoe 22:34, 21 February 2007 (CST)

Added some fundamentals to the chemistry pages as it was not clear that contrary to physics chemistry deals only with the interactions between electrons or physical forces with electron(s).

The Human Skeletal System

What do you mean by this comment on my discussion page? What does "nowiki'd" mean? I am new here:

    "I nowiki'd the human skeletal anatomy as that is a subset of the human anatomy system. I hope you can agree, else - remove the nowiki's. 

Robert Tito | Talk 22:13, 15 February 2007 (CST) "

It was never my intention to create a disconnected page in isolation. Yes, the human skeletal system is a subset of human anatomy, which wiki page I created because it didn't exist. Human anatomy is a subset of Anatomy, which page I also created. Anatomy is a subset of Morphology, which page I also created. If you go to the Biology page now, you will find that, if you click on the Anatomy link, it will lead you now through anatomy and human anatomy to skeletal anatomy. You have to understand that pages don't just appear full grown. They have to be built up and, in a lot of cases the basic structure isn't even there yet. So, if you've done something that will make my hard work disappear, please undo it now.

--David Hume.

Robert Tito | Talk 22:13, 15 February 2007 (CST)

Chemistry page

I added a sentence on the problem you requested. I had removed it because I consider that a description of bonding was probably best left to the "Bonding" section. Do you like it now? Pedro Silva 09:09, 10 November 2006 (CST)


I received a masters in physical chemistry and biochemistry in 1982 from the free university of amsterdam and was awarded a doctorate at the leiden university in physical chemistry on a study on the dynamic behavior of partially charged polyelectrolytes in a bad solvent in the very diluted regime.

After that I did quite some research for privately held companies that didn't allow publication of the researches executed. Slowly moving away from chemictry toward process automation and interactions with databases I became more and more interested with the concept of active databasemanagement in laborotory situations - extending towards office automation and distributed computer problems.

Nowadays I lecture at the holland highschool (college) as well at the the hague highschool. Other projects involve knowledge management problems and semantics within computer sciences as well as cryptography problems.

Database question

Hi Rob,

On the notice board, you asked

In the Computer Science part only Relational Databases are mentioned, not flat file databases, record structure databases or Hierarchical databases. Is this on purpose?
Thanks for any answers, If not on purpose I can add these pages.

Please see my answer on Talk:Database. --Larry Sanger 15:30, 12 November 2006 (CST)

Chemistry workgroup

I set up a preliminary Chemistry Workgroup and listed you there as an editor. Fred Salsbury 07:58, 21 November 2006 (CST)


See my answer on Talk:Computer; also, when signing messages, it's best to use 4 tildes (like this -> ~~~~ ), as that will turn into a link to your user page, and the date, which is the conentional signing form on the wiki. Thanks! JesseWeinstein 16:09, 24 November 2006 (CST)

the Status and the nature of wiki's

I wonder what we want the nature and status of CZ to be: neutral in all its content or colored based upon culture, politics or personal opinions. So far the latter leads only to more biased reproductions of facts - nearly all mingled with personal opinions and trying to bring personal thoughts as being factual. As an example: whether or not anyone is for the death penalty. That is an opinion, not something accepted in many countries. In most if not all european countries talking about the capital punishment is allowed - sure why not, but impossible to implement due to constitutions. And rightfully so - any culture claiming to be of high moral value should ask that same question: does it show any high level of ethics to maintain the capital punishment or does it show the old rule of an eye for an eye. As Mahatma Ghandi said: an eye for an eye makes the world blind.

Cycles Research

Robert, thanks for the welcome. My interest in joining citizendium is cycles research which is an interdisciplinary field covering all manner of subjects - economics, biology, geology, astronomy, physics, history, etc etc. Therefore it doesn't sit neatly in the scheme of subjects unless added in its own right (which I generally find people object to). Any suggestions are welcome. I consider myself an expert in cycles research with a smattering of knowledge in many other fields. I would like to be an Author and Editor regarding cycles subjects. If this is possible then I will start making some contributions. RayTomes 22:45, 29 January 2007 (CST)

User:Jeff Cook

I believe that block was made in error -- he was a victim, not a vandal. Shanya Almafeta 21:59, 30 January 2007 (CST)


I don't know if the Vandalism is over yet. For some reason, your message on my discussion page is not showing.--Ruth Ifcher 22:30, 30 January 2007 (CST) I would suggest that Nancy protect her page for the evening, if the vandalism is upsetting her. But, remind her to unprotect it tomorrow.--Ruth Ifcher 22:40, 30 January 2007 (CST)

I saw that your user page has been vandalised. I hope you get the problem under control. Stefan von Berg

have a look at the following article: Proatheris Stefan von Berg I just got there by chance.

Speedydelete template

Why did you delete the speedy delete template? We ultimately could use one so that people can tag pages and categories and all constables would have to do is check a category every once in a while. -- ZachPruckowski 22:50, 30 January 2007 (CST)

I, too, thought this was strange. Shanya Almafeta 22:51, 30 January 2007 (CST)

I guess it could have looked like I was asking for a delete with a page with the word delete in it. Heat of the moment with vandalism flying, it happens :-) I'll just remake it when I get a chance, no big deal -- ZachPruckowski 22:53, 30 January 2007 (CST)

Oh, the vandals had been using that template? That explains a lot. my bad then. Obviously I missed that. -- ZachPruckowski 22:58, 30 January 2007 (CST)

No, I was using that template to attempt to mark for the constables pages that had been created by the vandals. I was blanking and reverting as fast as I could, and leaving that in pages that (obviously) had no business being on Citizendium. The vandals never used that. Shanya Almafeta 23:00, 30 January 2007 (CST)
OK, then I'll remake it on that page then. -- ZachPruckowski 23:32, 30 January 2007 (CST)

Would it be beneficial if I made the Speedydelete template record who put it down? That way you could tell if a vandal was dropping it or if a counter-vandal was? --ZachPruckowski 23:51, 30 January 2007 (CST)

Sadly, it appears harder to force that than I'd like. -- ZachPruckowski 00:07, 31 January 2007 (CST)

The template code is here. But I'm in the middle of messing with it at the moment. -- ZachPruckowski 00:25, 31 January 2007 (CST)

I need to do my homework. As it now stands, I can't get it to identify the user who laid down the template automatically. I'll work on it tomorrow, but it's quarter to 2 in the morning, and I have 90 minutes of homework to do. -- ZachPruckowski 00:45, 31 January 2007 (CST)

Re protection

I get a drop down menu on Wintel XP Tell me a file to protect and Ill give it a go David Tribe 03:22, 31 January 2007 (CST)

kick-A** Dutchman

Thank you, Great Warrior. Nancy Sculerati MD 06:53, 31 January 2007 (CST)


Thanks very much for helping when my user page was vandalised yesterday. One small quibble, though. After my user page was moved to an offensive title, someone restored the old content at the correct page, and then you deleted the page at the offensive title. However, this destroyed the edit history of that page (since the page you deleted was actually the original user page, just moved to a different location). Now, in this instance, it's not really a problem, because there's nothing of importance in the history. In other cases, though, it might be a problem, so I suggest making a general practice of moving the page back rather than deleting it. Cheers, Nat Krause 13:50, 31 January 2007 (CST)

No problem. I appreciate the need for alacrity.—Nat Krause 14:04, 1 February 2007 (CST)

Astronomy high priority items

The reason ESA, NASA, etc are not listed is because I am far from done! James F. Perry 15:48, 31 January 2007 (CST)

Please feel free to add to the listing of Astronomy high priority items! You really don't need my permission to do so, though. Long term, I may work on some of the Astronomy articles related in particular to the Renaissance period (Copernicus to Newton). I am one of the few living people who has actually read Kepler's Astronomia Nova - in Latin! Check out the WP article on Kepler's laws. James F. Perry 15:58, 2 February 2007 (CST)

Warning on blocking Users

Hi Rob,

The only problem I can think of, is that perhaps you blocked this user and did not "uncheck" the box, "Prevent account creation." If you leave this checked, anyone with the same IP address, can not set up a new account, like Jeff Cook. How do you fix this? Perhaps, you have to unblock him and then reblock him, with "prevent account creation" unchecked. My best guess... --Ruth Ifcher 21:28, 31 January 2007 (CST) Addenda: It looks like you may have done this with all your blocks. You do not want to do this to a User who created an account with a badly formed name, say. If you do not uncheck "Prevent account creation," all these new Users are banned undefinitely.See the list of blocked IP addresses and Usernames. All you blocks prevent account creation.

--Ruth Ifcher 21:38, 31 January 2007 (CST)

I hope you find a solution. You have done this to multiple users, with poorly formed User Names. If you can't undo it, perhaps you should contact a developer. --Ruth Ifcher 21:56, 31 January 2007 (CST)

recruitment letter

could you help us with this? -Tom Kelly (Talk) 23:49, 31 January 2007 (CST)

CZ Developers

I am not a Citizendium developer. I am on the Exec board and relatively knowledgeable about technical issues though. I also handle some of the bug tracker functions. I want to eventually be a developer for CZ, but I have a lot of learning to do before I reach that point. -- ZachPruckowski (Talk) 19:19, 1 February 2007 (CST)

Thanks ...

for the welcome. I'm just trying to make my first contribution to the Industrial Revolution article, but I keep getting an edit conflict. The article had a active link, but there was no history and the content indicated that the database was having trouble resolving it. Any ideas on how to get this fixed? Neville English | Talk 09:46, 4 February 2007 (CST)

That did the job. Thanks for the quick response. Can I suggest that you edit your preferences to include a link to your talk page in your signature. You need to check 'Raw signatures' and put something like [[User:Robert Tito|Robert Tito]] | [[User talk:Robert Tito|Talk]] as your nickname. Neville English | Talk 11:45, 4 February 2007 (CST)
You need to remove the nowiki stuff - that stops the parser from interpreting the commands embedded in the tags! Neville English | Talk 11:58, 4 February 2007 (CST)

Thanks for welcoming me

Thank you for welcoming me to Citizendium Pilot. I didn't know precisely how to mention it to you, so I hope this is appropriate. I hope to edit some articles in the near future, though I'm not yet bold enough to start a new one. DaveO 11:17, 4 February 2007 (CST)


Hi Robert,

Thank you for your welcome (or was it a bot?). Don't think I'll be doing any editing as I don't much like the structure round here - policemen, etc. (although I note you are one). Also I'm confident enough of my own editing not to feel the need for people peering over my back "marking" me. I just joined to point out an error on the biology page - which I can't correct anyway. Good luck with your project. Cheers --Michael Johnson 18:37, 4 February 2007 (CST)

I'm glad it wasn't a bot...! Well I'm having too much fun on Wikipedia, if you ever get over that way look me up, I edit under my own name. And yes the gentleman who gave me a traffic ticket the other night definately was a Constable. Cheers, --Michael Johnson 19:01, 4 February 2007 (CST) (PS moved your comments to my talk page - if I ever do get involved here, I'd want to start right.)

Who is this page wiper?

Can we block his IP address? this is getting annoying just watching the recent changes. I can only imagine how upset you must be. Can we track his/her location geographically? -Tom Kelly (Talk) 00:25, 5 February 2007 (CST)

It's doable to work out a geography from an IP, but it's imprecise rather easy to fake. -- ZachPruckowski (Talk) 00:33, 5 February 2007 (CST)

Hej, the article water (molecule) got wiped out and there is no history left to bring it back. What happened? If this can happen with any article, then it won't be much fun working here. Stefan von Berg 14:54, 18 February 2007 (CST)


how can i be a part of the citiz my interrests are searchengines and encyclopedias



Nice to see all these new people. If you see anybody doing anything funny that you'd like a hand with, leave a note here or on my page. --Mike Johnson 11:37, 7 February 2007 (CST)


Genetic testing and profiling probably belong to another article, probably all on its own evenDavid Tribe 23:31, 7 February 2007 (CST)


Hi Rob. I wonder if the welcome template should include a link and some verbiage about Citizendium_Pilot:Discipline_Workgroups, encouraging new folks to join to their liking. Looks like some interesting folks arrived today. Stephen Ewen 01:41, 8 February 2007 (CST)

Vandal alert Hida Hidergard

David Tribe 14:51, 8 February 2007 (CST)

Request from Jeff Cook

Hi Robert, The following email from a Jeff Cook was in the INBOX. I'll turn this over to you.Bernard Haisch 18:15, 8 February 2007 (CST)

Subject: Ban From: "Jeff Cook" <> Date: Wed, January 31, 2007 1:26 pm To:

I was blocked accidentally by Robert Tito. He said he unblocked me, but he hasn't, because I still can't edit from any IP address I use. Please fix?


Hi Robert. It would be useful to me to have your email. Also, I should have email which forwards to Are you able to set this up, and if not, who? Cheers, BernieBernard Haisch 18:41, 8 February 2007 (CST)


Thank your for the welcome message. I probably won't start editing for a while though; at the moment I'm just having a look at Citizendium, and I couldn't get past the main page without creating an account. But hopefully Citizendium will prove itself superior to Wikipedia, and I will only edit here. Ivan Kricancic 23:54, 8 February 2007 (CST)

Yes, thank you - I don't know what all that was about. Ivan Kricancic 01:00, 9 February 2007 (CST)
Help! It's happening again - a new page move vandal. Ivan Kricancic 01:29, 9 February 2007 (CST)

dont' delete

Hi Robert, what a pain, hopefully they'll grow up soon. For future reference, don't delete the users immediately. For example, your deletion here:

"(Deletion log); 00:27 . . Robert Tito (Talk | contribs) (deleted "User:Jared Brogan")"

took the RNA interference edit history with it too. It was a sophisated switch-a-roo which means the current RNA interference page has vandalism in the page and I cannot revert back to the last good version. I believe this might even be their strategy. The best strategy to beat these vandals is to block them but only delete once the moves have been undone. I noticed several other instance where the edit history and in some cases the content was deleted too.

Undeletion of the above edit will gives us back content and history for Vertebral subluxation"
  • (Deletion log); 00:46 . . Robert Tito (Talk | contribs) (deleted "User:Gary Schumann": vandalism)
Undeletion of the above edit will gives us back content and history for Homeopathy
Undeletion of the above edit will gives us back content and history for User:Jeffrey A. Morton


  • (Deletion log); 01:08 . . Robert Tito (Talk | contribs) (deleted "User:▄▄█▀▀ █▬█ █ ▀█▀ ▄▄█▀▀ █▬█ █ ▀█▀ ▄▄█▀▀ █▬█ █ ▀█▀")
Undeletion of the above edit will gives you back the content and history for your own user page. I have already moved your talk page.

Note: for the last two deletions above you deleted this page twice within minutes (1:10 and 1:08) and in the process deleted the edit histories for two different pages. It is seems they are trying to cause so much confusion that we end up vandalising our own encyclopedia. I suppose we can coin the new phrase, the "fog of vandalism".

I have left the talk pages for homeopathy and Vertebral subluxation at the vandalised location for now until we can move them together with the article content. Chris Day (Talk) 02:19, 9 February 2007 (CST)

I was sad to see that after only moments of showing up my bio had been deleted by Robert after it had been vandalized by User:Frederica Cortéz. I'm still sorting out how to best clean it up, but hardly a good welcome. I hope things improve and this is just a Slashdot-related vandal spree. Steve Bonds 02:43, 9 February 2007 (CST)


I noticed you blocked R.J. Hosking-Young. I'm not clear on what the current rules are. To me, that looks like the sort of name somebody might publish under, so I would have figured the initials were okay.—Nat Krause 18:57, 9 February 2007 (CST)

Leopard image

- It really has nothing to do with Leopard being finished or not, I think it's nice to showcase OS X' latest features and Leopard has them, that's why I added it. Cheers, Alex Bravo | Talk - Time Machine is certain, and some ZFS integration is present in current betas, but what does that have to do with the screenshot? - Screenshots where? I only added a generic desktop! (I'm lost)


Thanks for your vigilence, and chivalry. :-) Nancy Nancy Sculerati MD 08:10, 10 February 2007 (CST) I like them both, gallant knight. Nancy Sculerati MD 19:35, 10 February 2007 (CST)

Undooing check

Ill continue working thrugh a double check you look out for new users till I finish. seems as if one got past you David Tribe 17:47, 10 February 2007 (CST)

Nice job

Sorry i couldn't join the fun, you contained them well this time. No damage by the looks of it. Chris Day (Talk) 19:27, 10 February 2007 (CST)

By the way, one more suggestion to speed things along. If you move the aticle page first the talk page goes along for the ride. If you move the talk page first the article has to be moved as a separate edit. This should reduce the number of moves by a factor of two. Chris Day (Talk) 20:19, 10 February 2007 (CST)


Please stop deleting my page and trying to block me - I'm a sysop and should not be blocked. Thanks. Greg Sabino Mullane 22:48, 10 February 2007 (CST)

Hold your fire, Rob. Greg's legit. :) EDIT: just so everybody's on the same page, Robert Tito is an acknowledged Constable, and Greg Sabino Mullane is an acknowledged sysop. He generally works behind the scenes on the wiki, which is why you haven't seen him around. All's well. --Mike Johnson 22:50, 10 February 2007 (CST)

Vertebral subluxation and attacks on my user page.

I regard Chiropractic as a discipline of massage. I do not regard it as a medically valid diagnostic system. I posted to Larry about this. Chiropractic is not to be regarded as medically valid; it's folk medicine. My user pages have been subsequently attacked. The article Vertebral subluxation is under suspicion. --Mark Odegard 01:18, 12 February 2007 (CST)

Where is the attack? It seems more like people are trying to explain their own rationale. Or did you delete the attack material? Chris Day (Talk) 01:34, 12 February 2007 (CST)

High priority Physics articles and Wikipedia source template

I just finished adding the Wikipedia template to all the high priority Astronomy articles where needed. Do you want me to do the same with the high priority Physics articles? Wherever I see interwiki links, that means the article came from WP and I remove those interwiki links at the same time I add the WP template. James F. Perry 21:23, 12 February 2007 (CST)

Re: Canada

Yes, I think that it was neccessary. It was lifted directly from Wikipedia, and was much too long according to both Wikipedia and Citizendium's guidelines. If people want to put parts of the Wikipedia article in Canada, of course I have no objection, but I think that keeping it all in is not productive and makes creating a clearly written article that much more confusing. Graham Pressey

where did Dr. Nancy go?

i noticed her page is deleted. ? -Tom Kelly (Talk) 22:59, 13 February 2007 (CST)

who is the guy, User:Nerijus Lamanauskas, that just got deleted with the funny name who wrote the brain article? he had no bio. -Tom Kelly (Talk) 23:03, 13 February 2007 (CST)

I can't answer the second question, but as to the first one, well, let's just say that Dr. Sculerati has decided to take a break from the project. Entirely contrary to the wishes of any of us, I am sure. Let's hope she returns in time. --Larry Sanger 23:15, 13 February 2007 (CST)

Well, I can't answer the second question, but the name is not that "funny" (as a typical Lithuanian one). It coincides with the name of a PhD student of neurobiology at the International School for Advanced Studies [1]. Restoring the account and leaving a request for a bio, wouldn't it be a better solution? (sorry for this little investigation, I couldn't resist. I know we can not do it for everyone who registers). --Alex Halicz (hello) 05:03, 14 February 2007 (CST)

My user page (vandalism)

Looks like you moved my user talk page back to where it belonged, but my user page could do with similar treatment. Thanks -- ZachPruckowski (Talk) 01:14, 14 February 2007 (CST)

math chaos

The answer is not clear. Firstly, chaos-related topics come often from physics (see SOC, or power law), so this is somehow inter-disciplinary; secondly, to decide math workgroup internal structure we should probably have more eyes there (and at the moment I see not many editors nor active authors). Let's wait. --Alex Halicz (hello) 04:32, 14 February 2007 (CST)

Let me know

I've been watching recent changes and see you and Alex working hard! If there is any way I can jump in, let me know. Matt Innis (Talk) 10:08, 14 February 2007 (CST)

YOU HAVE GOT TO BE BRAIN DEAD! How did you do this all morning!!! I am doing this between patients, so I may have to leave occasionally. Is there a way to let you know when I come and go? Matt Innis (Talk) 13:53, 14 February 2007 (CST)

Is this a normal day? Do we get this many everyday? Matt Innis (Talk) 14:04, 14 February 2007 (CST)

Your welcome is better than mine:( Matt Innis (Talk) 14:18, 14 February 2007 (CST)

Yeah, holy crap, this must be driving you nuts! But it's essential for us. We got mentioned on Slashdot twice today, hence the higher traffic. -- ZachPruckowski (Talk) 14:46, 14 February 2007 (CST)

We received a mention here as well. -- ZachPruckowski (Talk) 15:02, 14 February 2007 (CST)

Physics group Top article

Let me know if you want the articles recently removed from the Top group restored there. I can also go through the remaining 13 articles in that Top group and remove the interwiki links which needs to be done anyway. I still favor the deletion of any non-Top article which has not been worked on since mid-November when the CZ pilot wiki started. Only non-Top articles and only the ones not worked on since. James F. Perry 17:34, 14 February 2007 (CST)

Re [2]

Yes, I would like Template:PROD and Template:Dated prod deleted, as both are templates for one of Wikipedia's deletion processes. When we develop a deletion process, I'm sure that we can do much better. David Ellis 18:39, 14 February 2007 (CST)

Image deletion

I uploaded an image with an apparent copyright violation on the Chiropractic page [3]. I deleted the image to avoid further viewing, but the article has already been approved so I think that the article needs to be updated as well. Since I was the one that did it, I didn't think it was appropriate for me to change anything. Can you check into it? Matt Innis (Talk) 22:16, 14 February 2007 (CST)

May I ask you to delete [[Image:MandelBlue.gif]]. I uploaded it, but it did not work for the thumbnail in the article (I converted it to jpg format that works so the old gif is a garbage). Thanks in advance. --Alex Halicz (hello) 14:47, 15 February 2007 (CST)

User Page Bio

Mr. Tito,

Thanks for letting me know about that, I noticed your message right after I added the bio section to my talk page. Cheers!

--Paul Derry 00:10, 15 February 2007 (CST)


Mr. Tito, thank you for welcoming me (actually the second time was much better). May I redirect my unfortunate Greek character username and talkpage to my English ones? If not, then kindly delete them.

Thank you,

Nikolas Argyros 15:36, 15 February 2007 (CST)

Thank you, I probably didn't clarify enough. I had created initially User:Νικόλαος Αργυρός and was blocked by you for using Greek characters. I've e-mailed you regarding the issue as later instructed. Shall we delete that empty userpage and talkpage, or can we use the #REDIRECT function for both to my new ones? Niko Argyros (talk) 15:45, 15 February 2007 (CST)
I do not intend to use it at all. Simply, if another Greek-speaking editor searches for me, he may locate me through the redirect. What do you do in these cases? Can I maintain the pages as simple redirects, or do we delete them? Niko Argyros (talk) 15:49, 15 February 2007 (CST)

Don't bother!

Hey Rob, don't bother blocking these accounts. There are 2500 of them, Jason says. He'll be deleting them and cleaning up the logs. I've asked him to do something that will prevent spam account creation. --Larry Sanger 17:47, 15 February 2007 (CST)

Input needed on how to educate more people on category importance,539.0.html -Tom Kelly (Talk) 19:42, 15 February 2007 (CST)

Check out how Chris has revolutionized the workgroups! I've been wondering how to do this for a very long time but had no idea how to pull it off. Is there any way we can somehow get this advertised you your Spam to new users to check out the workgroup recent changes so that they will add the correct workgroup categories to their articles... so that the related changes for each workgroup functions like it should? -Tom Kelly (Talk) 00:35, 16 February 2007 (CST)

copied from a talk page


go to the biology workgroup wiki page and check out the cool things Chris has done with the recent changes in the biology workgroup articles. this is why we need any related biology articles tagged properly. look at the link underneath "all articles" in the table at the top.-Tom Kelly (Talk) 21:01, 15 February 2007 (CST)

Chris Day's effort answers this question. Tell people to take advantage of this workgroup tool to make their work VISIBLE David Tribe 00:24, 16 February 2007 (CST)
Yup, spread the word. Just start posting all over people's talk pages, forums, email, whatever it takes. We need to educate the new authors and current and new editors. -Tom Kelly (Talk) 00:26, 16 February 2007 (CST)


Re message on Chris Days Work . COOOL. Now see what your persistent yapping about categories has done - its started a category revolution! Seriously this now provides a DRIVING FORCE for people TO WANT to have their articles tagged in particular workgroups Congrats. I'm really impresses TOM. David Tribe 00:15, 16 February 2007 (CST)

adding topic to article

Hi Rob, sorry for this display of total ignorance - how do I add a topic (mathematics) to the articles I wrote ? Thanks--dlehavi 23:55, 15 February 2007 (CST)

Hi Rob, these two will need sysop tools, vandal moved the original twice so cannot be undone with out deleting the orginal page first. Chris Day (Talk) 11:53, 16 February 2007 (CST)


In reference to your comment: "small introductory pieces are mentioned as stubs in the summary as well as in the text (can you agree with this way to seperate articles?) Robert Tito | Talk 22:20, 16 February 2007 (CST)"

I created a Template:stub, since none existed, as follows:

Stub - This is a stub. Feel free to edit the content of this page, section, or paragraph, depending on where you found this message. However, if there are links, please do not alter or delete them without conferring with the author of the referenced pages. The stub was probably put here to create a hierachy to form a path between the page above and below this one.

This means that, when one adds the phrase "stub" enclosed by double braces on a page, the above phrase will appear in its stead. I notice that some people have been adding phrases like "fish-stub" to their pages. I don't think this is appropriate. A stub, is a stub, is a stub, no matter what your page is about..

Your thoughts?

Slow down please...

Hi Rob, if you actually read the protocol, which you must do, you'll see that you shouldn't do any deletions until the tagger has written "Yes" after "Done?"

Also, you haven't signed up to delete "Z"!

I'm done with "Q" by the way. :-) --Larry Sanger 13:55, 17 February 2007 (CST)

Oops! Me, too. Talk about poor timing. Matt Innis (Talk) 14:25, 17 February 2007 (CST)

Do you expect me to write 26 tags from A - Z?, besides where are these YES DONE fields? I haven't seen one of them, nomatter speedydelete or another delete I was fortunate to save Quantum chemistry for deletion. Robert Tito | Talk 14:29, 17 February 2007 (CST)

Yeah Robert, pay attention:) Matt Innis (Talk) 14:43, 17 February 2007 (CST)

Just look on CZ:The Big Speedydelete under "Sign up list". You'll see the "Done?" lines as well as places for you to sign up. Do read the whole page...there are set rules and I don't want anyone to delete anything beyond them...not that I'm accusing you or anything, I'm just sayin', on general principles.  :-) --Larry Sanger 14:36, 17 February 2007 (CST)

Re [4]

Yes, please. David Ellis 14:33, 17 February 2007 (CST)

I think i should be able to clean up my user pages when i would like

I noted the comments you made and when the comments are refered to me and are also noted other places, I feel that I should be able to clean up and remove those comments. -Tom Kelly (Talk) 02:01, 18 February 2007 (CST)

The comments I delete are on my talk and user page and I think that I should be able to clean up that page as I wish. correct? I would never purposely do that on other pages. -Tom Kelly (Talk) 02:06, 18 February 2007 (CST)

Please Restore "Cold War" article

Hi there. I just tried to email the Constables list, but the email bounced back at me.... So coming straight to you!

Here's the text of the email I just sent:

Just to let you know that I am working on the Cold War article that was just deleted as part of BSD.... Could we have it restored please?

I don't think the marker could have checked the page history very well!

Best regards,

Paul James Cowie 16:04, 18 February 2007 (CST)

Thanks for restoring! Paul James Cowie 16:12, 18 February 2007 (CST)

journals lists

I think I marked t hem all specifically for keeping. DavidGoodman 18:50, 18 February 2007 (CST)


Why are you locking lots of pages from editing as well as moves? Even talk pages? Whyyyyyy? Rob Levin 23:45, 18 February 2007 (CST)


Any reason not to speedydelete? --Larry Sanger 08:22, 19 February 2007 (CST)

Your change to my userpager

Hi Robert, I' sorry, but I don't understand your edit (see here) :-). There is no problem for me at all. I just don't understand it. Will there at any time be an article with the title "cities"? Isn't it more likely that a "city" article will appear. -- Alexander Wiebel 14:18, 19 February 2007 (CST)

Hillary Hildegard articles

What is going on with the Hillary Hildegard articles? They all should be deleted.

James F. Perry 22:46, 19 February 2007 (CST) done Robert Tito | Talk 00:03, 20 February 2007 (CST)

Thanks for the welcome

Thanks Sir Rob-Glad to be back Nancy Sculerati MD 14:25, 20 February 2007 (CST)


If you look at my outline on server (computer), I'm aiming to use that article to cover the actual physical server computer, and I want to have specific articles for each different type/function of server, as well as a conceptual client/server model article. For right now, I'm only focusing on the article for the physical computer part of the server. --ZachPruckowski (Talk) 14:49, 20 February 2007 (CST)

Dual-channel architecture

If you could check the talk page Talk:Dual-channel_architecture, someone wants the article moved because there's also a safety term with that name. Whatever new name you want for it would be fine (although I'd like Dual-channel memory personally). Thanks -- ZachPruckowski (Talk) 15:04, 20 February 2007 (CST)

If you want to do a disambiguation page, go for it. I don't really care, I just want to make sure that this guy's legitimate concerns are addressed. -- ZachPruckowski (Talk) 18:20, 20 February 2007 (CST)


Robert, you finished Bj-Bz.-Versuri 17:22, 20 February 2007 (CST)

missed in the noise

Hi Robert, this move, Talk:Embryology, got missed in one of the vandal spree's can you move the talk page back? Thanks Chris Day (Talk) 02:46, 21 February 2007 (CST)

Why protect FSF?

Why did you protect the Free Software Foundation page? Only sysops can move pages now, so there's no need for move protection; and shouldn't everyone be be able to edit the article? --Larry Sanger 14:26, 21 February 2007 (CST)

I think there may be confusion here. I suggested to Matt that it was OK to delete the article. The only reason i brought it to citizendium was to link from the copyright templates (Category:License tags). However, we are still not clear which templates we will need and rather than link to this page it may be better to link to FSF external site. The protection confusion is due to the fact we protected the GNU_Free_Documentation_License page. There is no need to protect the FSF article if we decide it is useful. Chris Day (Talk) 15:31, 21 February 2007 (CST)

Missing article

Hi Robert,

I put up an article a week or two ago, Estrada de Ferro Oeste de Minas. It has disappeared, without any indication why. Can you tell me what happened to it?


--Michael Johnson 16:01, 21 February 2007 (CST)

I can always put it up again. I had thought to bring across a few articles I had written, however if they are just deleted, cannot see the point. Is this a continuing process or a one-off. Cheers, --Michael Johnson 22:00, 22 February 2007 (CST)


Can you place the privs procedure here? -Matt Innis (Talk) 21:30, 21 February 2007 (CST)


Agree. Will add podcast. Cheers. Jérôme Delacroix (Talk) 23:12, 22 February 2007, Paris


how about we just delete this guy? [5] Matt Innis (Talk) 22:01, 26 February 2007 (CST)

U is done

That was fast! And i thought you were off to bed? Or did you just get up? Chris Day (Talk) 00:38, 27 February 2007 (CST)


I reck'n that this baby's ok 'cept these bits:

Larger hydrocarbon molecules will shy away from the solvent water and will form a double layer system of water and oil. The thorough mixing of these two layers into a stable emulsion is a basic ingredient of cooking. Anyone who has tried to mix an oily ingredient with a watery ingredient will know of the separation of phases (for instance mayonnaise) and easy home experiments will solve that problem.
An example is electrostatic shielding of charges on partially charged polyelectrolytes by hydrophobic, non-polar functional groups, where the charges on the macromolecule respond to each other over smaller distances than normal, thereby reducing the charge-driven repulsion between charged parts of the molecule. For each individual charge, the other charges seem to be farther away because this shielding reduces their effect.

I had trouble working out what was meant, and they still seem a bit confusing or not as good as they could be (I'm trying to be diplomatic, Master of subtlety and silence.) Over to you David Tribe 06:50, 28 February 2007 (CST)

Image deletes

You are just toooo fast:) -Matt Innis (Talk) 12:37, 28 February 2007 (CST)

Now the question is: what about Wikipedia? Those images are all over WP and I don't know how long they have been up. Then there is the text problem as well. Finally, there is which has the same images ("based on") and text as well. I don't think the NG legal department knows about that yet..James F. Perry 12:44, 28 February 2007 (CST)


The confusion for me is using "1000 Dalton" in one sentence and then "millions of Daltons" in the next sentence. Not being a chemist, it made my head turn 180 degrees laterally on my neck ;) Is that correct as well? Matt Innis (Talk) 15:58, 28 February 2007 (CST) yes it is, compare it to e.g. 500 g and compare it to the statue used tons of material where 1 ton = 1000 kg. 75 km versus hundreds of kilometers. Robert Tito | Talk 16:06, 28 February 2007 (CST)

K, thanks of the edumecation! Matt Innis (Talk) 17:05, 28 February 2007 (CST)

Re [6]

I've uploaded the photograph to Image:Keplersnr chandra big.jpg. David Ellis 21:51, 1 March 2007 (CST)

Re top

Well, my point was - as discussed on the forum -- that there is no more "top" category for many workgroups, math now included (e.g. this category is no more featured on WG main page). So I doubt if keeping "top" would give it any priority in math. On the other hand, we have just forged a new structure -- or "attack plan" -- based on math subject classification; David is actually working on it and we shall see it very soon.

About the TOP articles, as far as I know some groups arent ready yet to get on with that - if they actually exist. So I am reluctant there Robert Tito | Talk

By the way, you disagree to give "BSD" tag to Trigonometric function? Well, the article hasn't been really edited, has it. It is not that bad as an article, but it does not really represent our work. Or maybe I overinterprete aims of BSD. Best, --Alex S. 14:58, 2 March 2007 (CST) I removed it because it seemed a nice article - with minor changes to be our document, I cant phrase 1+1=2 other than 1+1=2, maybe as 3-2=1. Robert Tito | Talk 15:28, 2 March 2007 (CST)


...I did not think about it -- it's just an old wikipedia habit :-) --AleksanderS 13:21, 3 March 2007 (CST)


Rob, I started a stub on Silicone. As I've been reading about implants for the cosmetic surgery stuff, I have come across this fascinating history of silicone for use in cosmetic surgery. The article I'm starting has a broader, more encyclopedic outlook. I was hoping I could convince you to write a section in that article about the different physical forms of silicone, and how its properties underly those forms. Perhaps you'd write an article on the physical chemistry of Silicone from that perspective? Or that includes that perspective? Thanks for considering it, anyway. Nancy Nancy Sculerati MD 06:36, 4 March 2007 (CST)

yo welcome

the pleasure was all mine;) I think I gave you some compliments back

Macro baby

Congrats on the of arrival in good health of your new chemistry group baby. David Tribe


Shouldn't that article have a template saying some of the material originally appeared on Wikipedia? Some paragraphs are verbatim. Stephen Ewen 00:02, 12 March 2007 (CDT)

Creating article with only minor edits?

Hi Robert, I just saw Atoms and Molecules which you brought from non-existence to 6 lines all with minor edits (including its creation). Surely at least one real edit was involved, or? Otherwise could you do more minor edits ;-) BTW, please have a look if you like the new look of the CZ:Computers_Workgroup page. Tot ziens --Markus Baumeister 19:03, 12 March 2007 (CDT)

Another baby last night, a boy this time

Very little squawking.


So you know Rob, the talk page link in your new signature does not appear to be functional. Chris Day (Talk) 00:19, 20 March 2007 (CDT) OUCH, thanks Chris, will get into it. I expected it to work. but then the only infallible human never will be born. Thanks for the warning. much appreciated. Robert Tito |  [[Talk]]