Difference between revisions of "CZ Talk:Philosophy Workgroup"

From Citizendium
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Martin Cohen
imported>Tom Morris
(moved Nick Gardner's thread from main page to talk page)
Line 47: Line 47:
==Anyone for a bit of hurt?==
==Anyone for a bit of hurt?==
I'd like to see a sort of cycle of articles about [[Pain]] as a feature of Citizendium. The philosophy aspects are crucial to an understanding, and all other general internet reference works treat it quite poorly. If anyone is interested or would know where to place it in your list of priorities, it would be appreciated. --[[User:Christo_Muller|Christo Muller]] [[User_talk:Christo_Muller|(Talk)]] 18:17, 16 February 2007 (CST)
I'd like to see a sort of cycle of articles about [[Pain]] as a feature of Citizendium. The philosophy aspects are crucial to an understanding, and all other general internet reference works treat it quite poorly. If anyone is interested or would know where to place it in your list of priorities, it would be appreciated. --[[User:Christo_Muller|Christo Muller]] [[User_talk:Christo_Muller|(Talk)]] 18:17, 16 February 2007 (CST)
==Philosophy and the economics of climate change==
Readers who are interested in climate chamge economics need an understanding of its underlying philosopy. In particular, an understanding of  the choice of the [[discount rate]]s used by the Stern Review and others depends upon an appreciation of what is meant by [[utilitarianism]] and by  the idea of [[agent-specific ethics]]. The CZ article on the former is only a stub,and there is nothing on the latter. The purpose of  this message is to tempt a qualified philosopher to fill that gap. Failing such a response, I may put foreword a draft myself, - writing  as an interested amateur.[[User:Nick Gardner|Nick Gardner]] 06:04, 28 August 2008 (CDT)
:Well, I'm still waiting for the philosophical illuminati to send me notice that I'm a fully qualified philosopher, but in the mean time I'll try and improve [[utilitarianism]] --[[User:Tom Morris|Tom Morris]] 11:45, 28 August 2008 (CDT)
:I am impressed. Is there more to come? [[User:Nick Gardner|Nick Gardner]] 14:22, 28 August 2008 (CDT)
Hullo Nick - honestly, I don't think its that complicated. There are very sound, practical issues involved in Climate Change economics, and only a few universal philosophical principles apply. You should certainly feel free to go ahead. [[User:Martin Cohen|Martin Cohen]] 12:17, 6 November 2008 (UTC)

Revision as of 04:26, 15 February 2009

Welcome!

November 7th

er.. looks like we need the YEARS too - it's a bit like the Marie Celeste here isn't it? What happened to all the editors! No matter, I guess we'll make contact eventually...

I'm just going to start working through the core philosophy pages, adding and enhancing them, not removing material unless ABSOLUTELY and 'UNCONTROVERSIALLY' wrong!

Actually, at least slightly controversially, for Aristotle's fans, I just adjusted the intro to that page, for example. Nonetheless, I think it makes the page work better as a whole. There's oodles to do, and I am going to rely on my access to material in a mini enclopedia I edited, which the publishers printed on the basis that authors could reuse content at their own discretion later. Please don't accuse me of self-promotion - the content has to be sourced, and if it ain't my work I can quote, it's going to take a lot longer. A lot of the best material is essays by contributors - I will contact them individually, to see if they are okay with CZ having extracts.

Early days, though - comments please!

Martin Cohen 23:52, 6 November 2008 (UTC)



January 10

Welcome, philosophers!

We've recently posted a call for participation to PHILOS-L and PHILOSOP and are happy to see all the new arrivals.

Some notes:

  • Philosophy could use some work. I started rewriting it but it's not anywhere near finished, and I would be happy to have lots of help. Many other articles need work, too. Dive in!
  • Many of the articles you see linked under "All Articles" and "Top Articles" above are not "CZ Live," i.e., they're inactive. You are strongly encouraged to scrap these and start over, or else to improve them radically (they need it). If you don't see the "Category:CZ Live" tag on an article, you can assume that no one here cares about it. (These articles were uploaded from Wikipedia, somebody then tagged them or made some very minor change, so they were not deleted in January's mass deletion of Wikipedia-sourced content. No one would care if you wanted to delete all the articles that have not been worked on here on CZ!)
  • In short, be bold.  :-)
  • Hey, you professional philosophers showing up: please send a CV and a Web link tending to show your bona fides to personnel@citizendium.org and ask to be made an editor. Details here at the bottom of the page. Someone will respond within a few days.
  • It so happens that we are looking for a lead editor for philosophy, tentatively to be called "Chief Area Editor," to help push things forward on several fronts in the Philosophy Workgroup.
  • Just to be clear: speaking for myself, while I have a Ph.D. in Philosophy, I do not claim to be lead editor, or an editor at all, of the Philosophy Workgroup. That's just because I'm so far away from doing anything like serious research in philosophy.

Thanks again for joining us and I hope to see your work on "Recent changes" soon!

--Larry Sanger 12:12, 10 February 2007 (CST)

I've just joined CZ and I can see there are a few gaps in the key list of philosophers - I've added half a dozen or so to the 'bio' list just, and intend to quickly fill those gaps! I propose to start with the WP version, compare it with standard reference works and my own notes. Actually, it should be possible to get basic pages up very quick here - the aim then is to raise the quality, and avoid the pitfalls of WP where irrelevant material is allowed to proliferate making the biographies unwieldy.

Martin Cohen 12:35, 6 November 2008 (UTC)

Anyone for a bit of hurt?

I'd like to see a sort of cycle of articles about Pain as a feature of Citizendium. The philosophy aspects are crucial to an understanding, and all other general internet reference works treat it quite poorly. If anyone is interested or would know where to place it in your list of priorities, it would be appreciated. --Christo Muller (Talk) 18:17, 16 February 2007 (CST)

Philosophy and the economics of climate change

Readers who are interested in climate chamge economics need an understanding of its underlying philosopy. In particular, an understanding of the choice of the discount rates used by the Stern Review and others depends upon an appreciation of what is meant by utilitarianism and by the idea of agent-specific ethics. The CZ article on the former is only a stub,and there is nothing on the latter. The purpose of this message is to tempt a qualified philosopher to fill that gap. Failing such a response, I may put foreword a draft myself, - writing as an interested amateur.Nick Gardner 06:04, 28 August 2008 (CDT)

Well, I'm still waiting for the philosophical illuminati to send me notice that I'm a fully qualified philosopher, but in the mean time I'll try and improve utilitarianism --Tom Morris 11:45, 28 August 2008 (CDT)
I am impressed. Is there more to come? Nick Gardner 14:22, 28 August 2008 (CDT)

Hullo Nick - honestly, I don't think its that complicated. There are very sound, practical issues involved in Climate Change economics, and only a few universal philosophical principles apply. You should certainly feel free to go ahead. Martin Cohen 12:17, 6 November 2008 (UTC)